ZenI
Professor Balthazar
The difference is stark when compared to the 2m we got for Villa who is far superior to Albiol and Callejon even if he's older. We got 3m euros for Caceres, after being unable to sell him for two years. He was a Uruguay international and 23 years old. Your argument doesnt stack up against the Barca history of transfers. Hleb was a starter at his previous club, a star, but we released him on a free transfer. Thats what we do with bench players, like Albiol and Callejon were. We simply are unable to get proper money for out of favor players, unlike Madrid.
Whats interesting is that even if players flop at Madrid, the club is still able to shift them for a profit or close to profit. They paid like 4m for Callejon and flogged him for 10m. Robinho was shifted for 42m to City after flopping at Madrid. We loan out all our flops until the end of their contract. The difference is big.
I agree, it's actually sad. Madrid also have a tendency to sell just before they really go downhill, like Robinho.