Its not only Munir or Sandro...Its Adama who will probably be in the first team next season. He is a hard worker just like Pedro and better in taking on players. Stll raw, but he could be useful as a super sub against tired defenders.
The only reason why Pedro is still in Barca is because he is (or was at least) okay with being a backup. Now if he's complaining about not getting enough time on the field, he needs to go. He's basically useless compared to our starters and I'd rather we give the limited minutes to some young developing players.
Don't see no complaining here. It's obviously difficult for him to get any meaningful minutes behind the superstar trio, you can't deny it. Thought his answer was alright.
The thing Pedro offers right now is security. If something were to happen to one of the front three Barca at least has a reliable experienced backup. Once Pedro is gone, there are only the youngins to rely on in case of injury or suspension.
The thing Pedro offers right now is security. If something were to happen to one of the front three Barca at least has a reliable experienced backup. Once Pedro is gone, there are only the youngins to rely on in case of injury or suspension.
If anything were to happen to any of our front three and we had to play Pedro we'd be just as screwed as we would be if we had to play Munir. If we played Sandro we'd even be less screwed, actually.
Pedro can play on both sides od attack (plays with both feet) and already proved useful as right winger in 3-4-3.
And don't forget he's been an asset for Barca since 2008 and always among hardest workers in this team.
I'd definitely keep him even if we weren't under transfer ban.
Thats kind've why we need to start raising a new backup for the RW Suarez can play on the left wing and Sandro in the center if need be in a smaller game but aside from Messi we have no competent RW but we have young prospects like Halilovic and Adama who may be able to fill that backup role.
If anything were to happen to any of our front three and we had to play Pedro we'd be just as screwed as we would be if we had to play Munir. If we played Sandro we'd even be less screwed, actually.
+1 Sandro goalscoring wise might be our best CF with Suarez's current form
Pedro can play on both sides od attack (plays with both feet) and already proved useful as right winger in 3-4-3.
And don't forget he's been an asset for Barca since 2008 and always among hardest workers in this team.
I'd definitely keep him even if we weren't under transfer ban.
True. Matter of fact, I actually see Adama growing into the Jeffren/Tello role of a fast counterattacking winger backup. But first he needs to improve his final product and fix his tendency to run head-down into defenders.
Halilovic still has along way to go. His occasional flashes of brilliance do not make up for his deficits yet.
I'd advise you to watch the recent Barca B games. You would see how Sandro struggles with being out wide. He'd probably do better when played as an inside striker, but so.would Pedro. And Sandro is still more of a gamble.
It's not like Sandro is scoring plenty right now. Other than penalties, he has not much to show for the last months. In fact, he actually missed quite a few chances recently
This
Where is this talk of Sandro playing wide coming from? Unless the attacker we lose is Messi himself chances are losing one of the front three would result in our tactics going back to Messi behind the two strikers, a position that saw Pedro score a single goal in 9+ games, which indicates that he would not do better, actually.
There are 3 possible scenarios
1) Messi is absent. Either play Rafinha in a winger/AM hybrid role, or fill the wing with Pedro. Don't see how Sandro could improve the elven in this scenario
2) Neymar is absent. Either you go for a like-for-like replacement and play Pedro or you take a gamble, shift the entire front three once again to accomodate Sandro. Which one is more likely to bear fruit?
3) Suarez is absent. That's where Sandro comes in, either as direct CF replacement or an inside striker like earlier in the season.
2 out of 3 scenarios are probably better off with Pedro. Given Sandro's recent run of form, I'd even say all 3 speak against him