KingLeo10
Senior Member
That's because he is more famous for some incredible failures in CL. It's as if you have a cake which is half very tasty even if boring and conservative, with some smooth chocolate, but the other half is full of shit. The cake is bad overall.
To praise Valverde, you have to pick the good stuff and completely ignore his massive bottlejobs.
I don't think many would blame him for a QF and SF exit given a declining team and chaotic club structure, if it weren't for the manner in which he lost those CL matches.
Maybe Roma was an aberration. But if your forwards gave you a 3 goal advantage at home and the opposing team was missing 2 of their top 3 attackers in the return leg AND you had already bottled versus Roma, you absolutely need to find a way to salvage that situation if you're an elite coach.
He's not a trash manager. He's average to above average. Never elite.