Comparing Roberto with Gabri
.
At this point Sergi is almost a good a Lucho was in his playing days. I'd say, he is even better at some aspect, like defense (he's nigh flawless at tackling and covering - always feel safe, when he's on the field), but worse at attacking proves, which will or will not improve. I think it will, because it already had. He seemed to have confidence issues, but he's getting braver and braver with every match. Some brilliant moves like that dribble against iforgotwhom or two brilliant passes two Suarez and one to Neymar proves that. I watched Barca circa Gabri era and don't remember ANYTHING even remotely close in terms of quality fro Gabri. But i guess BBZ's gonna BBZ.
Ok.
Let's agree that Roberto is a better player than Gabri.
I was also a kid back then, so maybe I am too sentimental about that era (when I started to follow Barca), so it may be that I am overrating players from that era, because they will forever be "my first love".
And everything was "golden" in my eyes, from that era...
I wanted to say that Gabri back then was a 12th player, the same as Roberto today.
Since Barca is much stronger today, it is logical that our starter is much better than starters back then (I mean, we had Saviola in attack :/).
But also that our current 12th player will be better than our 12th player from those days.
So, in many ways, it's surely: Roberto>Gabri.
But also, you have to slightly open doors to one option also: Revisionism.
I said that Gabri was a very promising player as a teenager, and was one of key players at youth WC in 1999, with Xavi.
My point is:
-- in 1999', Gabri was considered as a great potential, and as a future Barca's starter and future Spanish NT level player
-- now, let's move forward 15 years...
Today we know how Gabri developed as a player and how good/average he turned out to be, and today's opinion about BOTH young player Gabri and senior player Gabri is influenced by everything what happened later in his career (when he was average).
In that sense, Rob is in a huge advantage currently, because currently he is young, he has potential, and people are "dreaming" about his further development. There is no disappointment yet...
My point, imagine a year 2025:
1. if Roberto develops into a Barca's starter over years, people will say in 2025: Roberto, what a player. He was silent (player) in teen years, but he exploded since the age 22, and it was clear already in 2015 that he will be a beast, which he accomplished later...
Anyone who didn't see his potential already in 2015 doesn't understand football...
2. but, imagine if Roberto turns "only" into a forever squad player in Barca, or if he goes to let's say Arsenal/Liverpool/Everton, and he fails there or turns into some Arteta and similar, then in 2025', people will say:
= Roberto? He was a good player. He had some potential, but he was never good enough for Barca's first team. He was good, but not good enough...
Also, already in 2015 it was clear that he lacks "something" to be a Barca's starter...
If you get my point?
Our opinion on player's whole career is influenced mostly by his whole career (when it ends), or more often, with his most recent or final years.
The same as when on Barca forum, each of our players is as good as he was in the last 3-4 matches.
When Mathieu is good, he is a lovable smoker.
When he is a crap, we should sell him and why we have even bought him in the first place, since he is a crap and always was a crap...
When Messi is good, he is a Goat again.
When he plays weaker for some time, he has lost it... He is not the same Messi anymore, we have to accept it.
The same is with youth players.
Majority of current youths in people's eyes have advantage over similarly good youths from the past which failed.
When Gai Assulin was young, he was hailed as the next Messi. Later he failed miserably. People will today use revisionism and say: he was not that good, he had personal problems etc. It was clear that he was not good enough...
Gio Dos santos, media (at least how I remember those days reading internet) were saying that he will be the next Ronaldinho.
-- when he failed, well, it is "easy" to say today: "He wasn't that good. The hype was wrong"
Deulofeu? Again, it is easy to say today (even though his story is still not finished), that he had problems with attitude or something.
Munir, Sandro, Adama? Only 2 years ago, a lot of users here were writing stories how those 3 will be our future Fcs for the next 10 years and how we will field 3 La masia Fcs in CL final. ("Our future is so bright", tons of users though back then...)
Dongou? Do I even have to mention him? Even for him people said: omg, we have 4 awesome strikers from La masia.
So, when someone today mentions Halilovic or Lee, and if someone else would reply (me, for example):
-- but we had tons of similar and equally good players with high potential in the past, and majority of them failed, a usual answer will be:
"Come on, you can't compare Halilovic to Munir, Sandro or Dos santos! Those players have nothing in common... Are you blind, man?"
I will add that each player is different, and yes, maybe some current players (Halil) are really much better than those guys, but you probably get the point what I am trying to say.
Munir was once a very promising La Masia striker with high potential, but after the last 2 seasons, majority will "forget" a young Munir and will form opinion about Munir based on what he showed in the last 2 years (aka, more or less=nothing).
So, if someone says that Halil is the same as Munir in that age, people will jump and say: Man, you are talking rubbish...
The same as if I say that Gio is the same as Halil.
= "No, no. Gio was a much different story. Nowhere near the close in potential to Halil".
Well, yes. It is easy to claim that today... when Gio failed, and while Halil or someone else is still young and with unpredictable and potentially bright future...
So, for the end, I agree.
Maybe my memory about our players from late 90s/early 00s is too romantic and biased, because they were my first love.
I love Roberto, I have just offered an opinion that it is HARD to be a Barca's starter and that it is a no shame to be 12th player, especially in the current Barca.
But also, please, after this long wall of text, some of you should open a doors to the revisionism idea, because our opinion of players change from time to time.
(I disliked Neymar in the past. He has "won" me now.
1 year ago I would say that Neymar was meh and a clown in his teen years.
If you would ask me today, I would reply that he was too playful as a teen, but that it was clear that he has "out of this world" potential...
So, you see, I changed my general opinion about Neymar, and now I have suddenly also revisioned my opinion about his whole career.
He is suddenly good in my eyes, from the day 1... Which is lie, honestly...
And I am sure that I am not the only one who's brain plays these revisionism tricks on us, so I only wanted to say: open the doors to that idea also in the future debates when we will discuss some former and current players).
And let's move on from Gabri vs Roberto.
I really had no interest to fight over that.
Cheers