serghei
Senior Member
Value matters, not how many years he had left of his contract. The point is Madrid payed a transfer fee of 30m. for Kroos, a player who is worth, in this market, a good, solid 45-50m. That is good bussiness if you ask me.
Toni Kroos
- Thread starter el tren
- Start date
Value matters, not how many years he had left of his contract. The point is Madrid payed a transfer fee of 30m. for Kroos, a player who is worth, in this market, a good, solid 45-50m. That is good bussiness if you ask me.
lazybum4hire
New member
Is he a Perez transfer or Ancelotti's?
Cule4life
The Culest
Im with you but we already paid "86 million" for a player with one year on his contract
R
Ryu Hayabusa
Guest
It only proves that he is an ungrateful twat and nothing but a merc. For the past 3-4 years, it has not even been true that going to Real is a step up from Bayern. It is just meant to piss Bayern supporters and Bayern officials off and to apple-polish with Real "fans".
darthvader7888
Banned
Definitely seems like a Perez transfer to me.
Last edited:
R
Ryu Hayabusa
Guest
I was just saying... has there ever been a non-Perez transfer in the Perez era at Real?
S2K1985
Chatbot
khedira ?
R
Ryu Hayabusa
Guest
yeah, quite possible.
Galning
Moderator
Im with you but we already paid "86 million" for a player with one year on his contract
17 to his club and 40 to him and his father. I don't understand why you get the 86M figure from unless you are also one of those guys that counts his running contract in the transfer price only because it's about Neymar. So basically we paid 17M and have him on insane wages.
darthvader7888
Banned
There's a reason "86 million" is in quotation marks.
Icarium
Lifestealer
Supposedly that is reason why Iniesta and Messi got contract extensions... Not sure... Anyway how much does Iniesta earn now??... Messi is 20M net i think
R
Ryu Hayabusa
Guest
Usually you don't have to pay a father to have his son playing for your football club. That is just insane. The fact that Barca did so anyhow, still makes me wanna punch someone, and I'm not even a Barca fan.
Galning
Moderator
Then Toni Kroos cost "72 million" if he has 7M per year.
Signing on-fees are not unusual. Neymar was wanted by all big teams in the world so I don't really care if we give the money to the player or to his club. 57M was a great deal.
Yes, Messi has a clause that he has to be the highest earner wage wise so basically he didn't need the extension because he still got the highest one. Only problem was that the 40M signing on fee is obviously also some sort of wage so after that went public they had to give Messi more because otherwise Neymar would earn shitloads more than Messi.
I don't know about Iniesta, it's possible that they also just gave him a raise because of it although I don't think he has a similar clause. They might just have given him a raise so that he wouldn't feel screwed over.
R
Ryu Hayabusa
Guest
A signing bonus for a player of that caliber is around 5 to 10 mio., not fucking 40 to his fucking dad you never did a think but impregnate some girl with said player.
Other than Neymar's marketing potential in Brazil (Not sure how many Brazilians actually buy legit shirts, but whatevs), I don't see how 57 or 86 mio. are a great deal when said player has one year remaining in his current contract.
Home of Barca Fans
