F
Flavia
Guest
I agree he shouldn't had played. It'd probably be better if Iniesta and Cesc were on the mf today.
I agree he shouldn't had played. It'd probably be better if Iniesta and Cesc were on the mf today.
I don't understand why Thiago didn't play, he isn't as good as a fit Xavi currently, but he was better than the Xavi we seen last night, by far. I mean not far into the game Xavi gave the ball away twice in quick succession by trying to do a fancy flick with his heel in dangerous areas of the pitch, he can afford to take stupid risks like that but can actually take risks in the final third where it wouldn't have cost us as much? I don't understand this. I always liked Peps idea of playing the team that he felt trained the best, and from what I seen from Xavi yesterday, he just wasn't ready to play. Bad decision from the coaching staff.
In my opinion against Bus parking teams we should consider not playing Xavi as maintaining possession is not difficult. Plus he slows down counter attacks. We can go with Cesc as his directness is what we need with MVP upfront
When xavi disappears, Barca disappears, It's simple as that.
When xavi disappears, Barca disappears, It's simple as that.
We had someone in that match who likes to take risks and love to move the ball forward, What good did that gave us? apart from losing the ball every couple of seconds, Thank god xavi was there to keep the possession you seem to ridicule, Otherwise we would have lost 4-0 or 5-0.Rubbish. If anything Barcelona are better off without him. He's a possession player, distributes the ball better than anyone else in Europe, but the lack of risks he takes with his passes harm the Barcelona side against sterner defences. He's slowing down, Barcelona would be better off putting Messi in midfield, Villa up front, and for the time being playing Pedro and Sanchez out wide.