Its not really my ideological point of view, it is that I believe the sample is tiny. If you looked at the season as a whole I would agree, but CL and EL are just a couple of games per season.
Again though, I agree with using it as a tool, it is much better than a lottery. But I dont agree with using it to actually "rate" teams, a qualitative measure would do so much better. That I suppose though, is in line with my general view of methodology. I find it is often pretty awesome to make qualitative judgement and keep an eye on quantitative figures, rather than go the other way.
Again though, I agree with using it as a tool, it is much better than a lottery. But I dont agree with using it to actually "rate" teams, a qualitative measure would do so much better. That I suppose though, is in line with my general view of methodology. I find it is often pretty awesome to make qualitative judgement and keep an eye on quantitative figures, rather than go the other way.
Last edited: