Why should we not mention that MaTS played in a tougher knockout competition against opposition of the highest quality as compared to Bravo. Plus using the U21 example is pure BS cause you can basically put Oliver Kahn with that defense and he'll still concede. Of all the games Bravo played, the relatively tough matches were against Atleti, RM, Valencia, Villareal, Sevilla and maybe Bilbao (who we rekt in the league) while MaTS played against City, Juve, Bayern, Atleti, PSG, Bilbao (the motivated trying to win only trophy version), Villareal and I'm still probably forgetting someone.
He played tougher knockout CL matches, and Psg in a group stage.
Then he played bunch of extremely weak matches in a CL group stage and in Spanish cup (except a few matches).
Bravo played some tougher matches in La liga also.
Real x2, Atletico x2, Valencia x2, Sevilla x2 and at least 10-ish tougher matches in La Liga.
He is the same age as courtois and a year younger than DDG. He needs to become a permanent fixture for barca soon or he will never reach the heights of those two keepers who had regular football week in week out since a young age.
I am not saying that he hasn't as good potential as those guys, but we are too often assuming that every one of our youngsters is a pure gold and the best potential in the world, and all he need is playing time to reach those heights.
Similar examples:
-- Adama only needs playing time, some might say
-- Halilovic only needs playing time to become a world class
-- Bartra only needs matches in a row to reach his insane potential :/
-- now the same with Mats
So, yes, in one hand:
1. some players have insane potential and they ONLY need time and matches to reach their potential
2. but on every player who needs only time, are probably 2-3-4-5 players who only look as if they have a high potential, but they aren't improving. Not because they aren't getting minutes, but because they just aren't as good as the best in the world and they'll never be
Anyway, I am not talking against Mats here, but this excuse is starting to be used too often by our fans lately.
We are taking as granted that Mats is the best Gk in the world. And all he needs is time.
I would personally rather read opinions like:
= let's give him some time and then we will see WHETHER is he actually good enough
= and NOT: let's give him time and he will more or less surely reach a needed level
You're talking to a wall.
People who think keepers like De Gea and Courtois started off like pro's who never made any mistakes.
I didn't watch Claudio when he was at this age, I reckon he played for Colo-Colo? BUT I bet he made similar mistakes because there's simply not been a GK at this age who's been free of mistakes. Not to forget Bravo was a bit blunder prone at Real Sociedad too where he played just a couple of seasons ago, but has been great and solid so far here and since the World Cup.
Neuer still makes stupid mistakes. De Gea has also had one mistake here and there. So has Courtois. The difference has always been that their fanbase and teams have supported them through it. Same with Oblak. Started off badly and as Atleti's cup keeper. Whenever he played, shaky as hell then towards the end of last season he looked like a different beast altogether.
But Don, again the same story.
Yes, there are great players and Gks out there who made mistakes while they were young and they needed a long period to reach the current level.
But AGAIN, there are 100s of players who were hyped to reach their levels and they failed.
So, what I personally don't like lately is:
= when Halilovic plays like an idiot, some people reply: But Messi also made mistakes when he was young
-- ok. But Halilovic won't be a new Messi, so let's look at his mistakes/flaws as on his flaws and let's leave Messi's development aside
So, yes, Messi also made mistakes, but Adama/Halil won't be new Messi's, no matter what happens.
Neuer/Curtois, yes, they made a lot of mistakes.
But again, Mats has 3 options:
1. we will give him chances, and no matter how many mistakes he will made, he will eventually turn into a next Neuer/Curtois/De Gea
2. we will give him a lot of chances, but no matter how much minutes he will get, and no matter how much he will learn/improve=he will never reach the highest level.
3. we won't give him enough of chances, and we will never know whether he is the guy from the point no1 or point no2
But again, too many of our fans are assuming that most of our youngsters ONLY need time and chances, and they will reach the highest level eventually.
Well, it doesn't work that way.
People are forgetting about guys from the point No2.
Who have a lot of potential, who get a lot of playing time, but who still end as not good enough.
In fact, there are much more those guys than Neuer's and De Gea's.