diDi7
Member
His attempt to make a save was almost non-existent. The ball travelled for about 4 to 5 seconds before it got in, and in that time, his movements were chaotic and not at all coordinated. He didn't even know were he was in relation to the goal. In short, he was cought cold, unprepared and not ready to make a save. That's his goal imho, because of that. He should be thankful that it happened at a good time, when things can be fixed without many troubles. If he did that in a CL semifinal for example, the reactions would have been ten times worse, and rightfully so.
That being said, he was excellent except for that unfortunate moment. He is young and has a bright future, but he does make mistakes. And one of the ways he could fix those mistakes is to realise them first, not act like he did nothing wrong and blame those things on bad luck. It's no coincidence that he received two goals from 50m in a month.
Okay, so now we have two ways of looking at this. Firstly, do you think his initial position has to do with Lucho's tactics? If it does, one COULD partly blame Lucho for the goal. Second, if it were up to you, where would you have stood at the time of that happening? Remember, Florenzi was deep on the side of the pitch where the defence should have cut out any intention of him trying to distribute the ball forward.
I'm going to look at the goal again from multiple angles and come back after observing a bit more. I think this goal and it's blame goes into much more of a grey area than most people are making it out to be.