Anyone can just watch the vid and decide if you are correct or not. I think If they decide that you are correct, they might very well be insane.
I think you are not really insane, but just very locked in some thoughts. Not very interesting to read your takes tbh, and your pompous way of writing as if you held the ultimate truth, even though it is obvious you don't, doesn't make it more interesting.
You have a hangup of width and want the wingers to stay very wide (and even think some wingers are inherently unable to do so) but now you also want the wide backs to also stay wide. Most would say it's a waste to have four players wide. Also, Barcelonas problem wasn't non-existent width but bad wing players, and bad build-up, leaving them with much of the ball in isolation. It is preferrable to play through the centre, especially for Barcelona, the max width should just be held to open up the pitch and force a shift of the defence. It is very strange to criticize Alves for building up very succesfully from the half-space, especially since this is clearly on instruction from the Brazilian NT coach.
What did reality do to your day-dreaming fantasies of Koeman being a great coach etc that you were on about this spring?
If my insistence on width is insane, what do you make of Xavi's insistence on width then?
By the way, you write in pompous style as well, and think you hold the truth, even though some of your takes have been ridiculed.
So what's the need to use that as an argument?
Then, no you are wrong. And totally wrong I should say:
Barca's problem was not bad wingers, but playing only 'nominally' wide players that were never wingers, or were never wing-backs.
like Gavi as RW
like Braithwate as RW
like Griezzy as RW
like Cou as LW
like Roberto as RB
and of course, the most emblematic of all: like Messi as RW, creating in 80% of the games last 5 seasons a hole in RW position of our pass and touch maps
Wingers need to stay out wide to receive, and unlike Messi or Cou, not cut inside to receive
Wing- or Full-backs need to provide width, when the respective winger has cut inside AFTER (and only after) he had received the ball wide and dribbled past several players.
Width has to be maintained all the time. That doesn't mean that all 4 players are all the time out wide. There might be overlaps or underlaps, but each moment both left and right flanks HAVE to have at least ONE outfield player vERY wide.
And that's coming from Pep, if you believe he is any valuable tactical resource
It's not preferable to 'play through the center', which in reality means having not only 3 or 4 central players there, but also cramming full-backs and 'nominal' wingers or wide-forwards there, making the team unable to build up
Building up from half-space can only work, when there is another player occupying the full-space on the same flank.
Look at how City plays, and I bet you can't find any moment where you see any of the flanks empty in its full-space.
And if you paid any attention to the 'Dani masterclass' clip you posted, you would have seen that WHENEVER alves was at half-space, Jesus was at full space: most likely the result of Tite's instruction
On the contrary, bad wingers is something totally different. It's like playing Trincao or Collado or Konrad, and then say that they were not good enough, not doing enough of the things a winger should do
PS: I believe you can do better with your arguments.
Your argumentation has worsened a lot the last months.