Erling Haaland

[behindbrowneyes]

Juventus have been out of the race the moment they've signed Vlahovic. Not that he was cheap. Fee was about the same as Haaland's buyout, but the additional costs of Vlahovic will be much lower.

United is too weak of a team for him to go there and they won't play CL.

I don't see him going to QSG either. Haaland is smart and he knows that France and Qatar won't be a good choice at this stage of his career.

He'll either go to Spain or EPL.

 

[Morten]

Juventus have been out of the race the moment they've signed Vlahovic. Not that he was cheap. Fee was about the same as Haaland's buyout, but the additional costs of Vlahovic will be much lower.

Besides, would Haaland really fancy Serie A right now? Doubt it.

 

[DonAK]

Would ask this question to City fans if they had any but if you're Man City and know Haaland will only be there for 4-5 years before going to Spain, do you still sign him for all this or sign Harry Kane for what overall is likely to be a lesser financial package?

Who gets you closer to winning a CL trophy right now?

Not that the extra costs are going to hurt a club de-facto owned by a state.

 

[Fati_Future_BallonDor]

He should go to City, with him Pep could win some cl's before leaving them. At Real he would never be the only star if Mbappe goes there.

 

[khaled_a_d]

Would ask this question to City fans if they had any but if you're Man City and know Haaland will only be there for 4-5 years before going to Spain, do you still sign him for all this or sign Harry Kane for what overall is likely to be a lesser financial package?

Who gets you closer to winning a CL trophy right now?

Not that the extra costs are going to hurt a club de-facto owned by a state.

They think he is a bargain

 

[Respekt_III]

Would ask this question to City fans if they had any but if you're Man City and know Haaland will only be there for 4-5 years before going to Spain, do you still sign him for all this or sign Harry Kane for what overall is likely to be a lesser financial package?

Who gets you closer to winning a CL trophy right now?

Not that the extra costs are going to hurt a club de-facto owned by a state.

4-5 years + sell on is better then spunking 120m+ ona 30yo player with 0 sell on value. Think the Kane boat has sailed for him and hope he and all spurs players never win anything ever in their lives.

 

[FinBarcelonafan]

Would ask this question to City fans if they had any but if you're Man City and know Haaland will only be there for 4-5 years before going to Spain, do you still sign him for all this or sign Harry Kane for what overall is likely to be a lesser financial package?

Who gets you closer to winning a CL trophy right now?

Not that the extra costs are going to hurt a club de-facto owned by a state.

City fans don't care about his salary and his buyout is cheap. Bargain either way and should have great resale value.

 

[Barcilliant]

My question is "Does he still have it"?. He's looking a little of the pace and unsure of himself at the moment. Wonder it is temporary or the injuries have slowed him down permanently.

 

[Messi983]

He's 21 lol, of course he'll get back in form.

 

[Temptation]

My question is "Does he still have it"?. He's looking a little of the pace and unsure of himself at the moment. Wonder it is temporary or the injuries have slowed him down permanently.

Surely. It's just recurring injuries

 

[FinBarcelonafan]

He's 21 lol, of course he'll get back in form.

Exactly. He is world class. Few injuries doesn't change that.

 

[Messigician]

He's done

 

[Messigician]

21 is too old anyway

Football is all about q7 year olds like gavi and saka now

 

[Messi983]

He's done

you're done too but somehow still here

 

[TheStig]

I think he will spend 3-4 years at City and then go to Spain, it depends which team will be better and richer at that time. Similar as CR7.