Erling Haaland

Catta

Catta

Senior Member
He is a Raiola client. Wouldn't surprise me if he doesn't sign for any of the currently linked clubs. His clients mostly go to Juve, United or QSG.
 
khaled_a_d

khaled_a_d

Senior Member
DonAK said:
Bild reported during the weekend that Man City are having doubts about signing him now due to the commissions wanted by his father and Raiola in this deal. Alfie Haaland want 30m while Raiola want 40m.

On top of that they want a 20-30m net salary for Haaland.
Click to expand...

I remember when Romolero reported 20+20 commissions snd Raiola laughed at him, now it is 70M total :lol:
 
behindbrowneyes

behindbrowneyes

Well-known member
Juventus have been out of the race the moment they've signed Vlahovic. Not that he was cheap. Fee was about the same as Haaland's buyout, but the additional costs of Vlahovic will be much lower.

United is too weak of a team for him to go there and they won't play CL.

I don't see him going to QSG either. Haaland is smart and he knows that France and Qatar won't be a good choice at this stage of his career.

He'll either go to Spain or EPL.
 
Last edited:
DonAK

DonAK

President of FC Barcelona
Would ask this question to City fans if they had any but if you're Man City and know Haaland will only be there for 4-5 years before going to Spain, do you still sign him for all this or sign Harry Kane for what overall is likely to be a lesser financial package?

Who gets you closer to winning a CL trophy right now?

Not that the extra costs are going to hurt a club de-facto owned by a state.
 
khaled_a_d

khaled_a_d

Senior Member
DonAK said:
Would ask this question to City fans if they had any but if you're Man City and know Haaland will only be there for 4-5 years before going to Spain, do you still sign him for all this or sign Harry Kane for what overall is likely to be a lesser financial package?

Who gets you closer to winning a CL trophy right now?

Not that the extra costs are going to hurt a club de-facto owned by a state.
Click to expand...

They think he is a bargain
 
Respekt_III

Respekt_III

Anti-everything
DonAK said:
Would ask this question to City fans if they had any but if you're Man City and know Haaland will only be there for 4-5 years before going to Spain, do you still sign him for all this or sign Harry Kane for what overall is likely to be a lesser financial package?

Who gets you closer to winning a CL trophy right now?

Not that the extra costs are going to hurt a club de-facto owned by a state.
Click to expand...

4-5 years + sell on is better then spunking 120m+ ona 30yo player with 0 sell on value. Think the Kane boat has sailed for him and hope he and all spurs players never win anything ever in their lives.
 
FinBarcelonafan

FinBarcelonafan

Well-known member
DonAK said:
Would ask this question to City fans if they had any but if you're Man City and know Haaland will only be there for 4-5 years before going to Spain, do you still sign him for all this or sign Harry Kane for what overall is likely to be a lesser financial package?

Who gets you closer to winning a CL trophy right now?

Not that the extra costs are going to hurt a club de-facto owned by a state.
Click to expand...

City fans don't care about his salary and his buyout is cheap. Bargain either way and should have great resale value.
 
B

Barcilliant

Senior Member
My question is "Does he still have it"?. He's looking a little of the pace and unsure of himself at the moment. Wonder it is temporary or the injuries have slowed him down permanently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Home of Barca Fans

Top