*Irony oversight"I'm sure we won't since he's sold.
Any details on the buy-back clause? How much after 1 year, 2 years etc.?
I don't think he'd refuse if we actually want to buy him back, if we do then it's not like we'll loan him out again. I feel once we assure him (be it contractually or otherwise) he'll come back. Also theres apparently a first option too so we don't have to buy him back after only one or two years he can come back as a seasoned player AFTER MSN is no longer as viable as it is right now.
Come on spread a bit of the love around. You just won the treble and make how many millions in revenue?People here thought we would get 15-20m for him.
In the end, we sell him for 6m euros. What is the real reason behind our outrageously charity-like selling policies?
Next up is Song. Will we give him away for free? My guess is that we will. Or even worse, we will loan him out, and pay part of his wages until his contract expires. It just doesnt make any sense to me that teams like Chelsea and RM get these fantastic prices for their players while we are simply a joke in the market.
It's a protection mechanism so we don't get screwed over by the selling club.What is the point of a buy-back if the player refuses to re-sign for Barcelona if we want him back?
That right there sums up your approach to logic, referencing someone else's opinion which none of us are privy to
I'll do you one better, Intro to Logic, great course to recommend
It's a protection mechanism so we don't get screwed over by the selling club.
Of course, the player has no obligation to re-sign.