Neymar Jr.

Status
Not open for further replies.

aragorn

New member
Andresito mentioned numbers.

Today rich teams are way richer and they have allstar teams.
In the past, there were 4-5 title contenders in each country.
Today you have Juve, Psg, Bayern winning 9 out 10 league titles, breaking records of wins and goals scored.

Roughly, let's say that in 90s, the difference between Juve/Psg/Barca and 13th placed team was 60:40 or 65:35.
Today it is closer to 80:20 or 90:10.

If I would make a list of top50 best individual goalscoring seasons, let's say Messi 2015, Messi 2018, Messi 012, R9 1997 etc, imo, out of 40-45 places out of top50, we would see players from the last 10 years.
I won't even mention Messi and Cr7.
But even Lewa, Suarez, Neymar, Benzema, Immobile have better or similar stats to prime Gerd Muller, Van Basten or Batistuta.

Neymar's league goals mean shit in a current stat-inflated era.
Also, CL wise, Muller and Van Basten played 3-4 CLs in their career and won 2-3 of them plus World cups or Euros.
Neymar will have 10 CL attempts, 4 attempts with Messi and 3 with MSN.
Yet, his stats are miles better than of all time greats like Van Basten and Muller.

Outside of a statpadding league records, the better indicator are CL titles and Wc/Euros/Copa Americas where the competition is similar to 70s or 90s.

About Ronaldinho being overrated: he won the WC aged 22.
And turned Barca who was worse than today into a machine after 6 Months.
And in the first season he was without Etoo, Deco, Messi, Guily, Larsson.
He played with finished Kluivert and Saviola.
Ronnie on his shoulders brought Barca to being the best club in Europe.
What has Neymar done?
1. 1 CL in 4 seasons with prime Messi (and still having Xavi, Busi, Iniesta, Dani).
2. going MIA each season in spring
3. winning 2 leagues in 4 seasons with Barca, lol.
4. doing more or less nothing with Psg and Brasil
5. rolling, diving, fighting with everyone

Putting Ronaldinho and Neymar in the same sentence is a blasphemy.
Absolutely

Heck if it wasn't for stupid partying - Ronnie would have probably achieved even more than Leo except for the stats!
 

Devils

Senior Member
How tf did this cat get hair like that?

This was literally his hair last weekend

https%3A%2F%2Feverythingbarca.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fgetty-images%2F2017%2F07%2F1233913453-850x560.jpeg
 

BBZ8800

Senior Member
Van Basten played like 7-8 seasons of CL and Muller played at least 6, maybe 7. It wasn't 2-3 CL wins in 3-4 seasons.

Stop skewing numbers DELIBERATELY and we will take your points more seriously.

Van Basten:
1988: Napoli played for Italy
1989: Milan played CL
-- Milan won CL
-- Van Basten top scorer with 10 goals in 9 matches
1990: Milan played CL
-- Milan won CL
-- Van Basten scored 4 goals in 9 matches
1991: Milan played CL
-- Van Basten played the first 2 matches
-- Van Basten got injured
-- Milan got KO'd in the next round without him, by Olympique Marseille
1992: Sampdoria played for Italy, Milan didn't participate
1993: Milan played CL
-- Van Basten was fit
-- Milan reached a final and lost 0:1 to Marseille
-- Van Basten scored 8 goals in 7 matches
1994:
-- Milan won a CL, Van basten was injured and finished his career

So, basically, Van Basten played 3 CL seasons on the highest level, winning it 2 times and losing 1 final.
So, 3 seasons = 3 finals.
Playing 25 matches in those 3 seasons and scoring 22 goals.
For a comparison, Ruud Gullit in the same period played 17 matches, scored 5 CL goals during that winning era.

Outside of Milan:
1984: Ajax, KO'd in the 1st round
1985: Ajax hasn't played
1986: Ajax KO'd in the 1st round
1987: Ajax hasn't played

So, Van Basten played 3 years for Milan and 2 for Ajax.
And one more for Milan where he got injured and that was the only time in Van Basten's 4 CL years at Milan when Milan didn't reach the final.

Gerd Muller, CL participations:
1970 Bayern, Kod in the 1st round
1973 Bayern WON, 6 matches 11 goals. CL's top scorer
1975 Bayern WON, 7 matches 5 goals. CL's top scorer
1976 Bayern WON again. 6 matches 5 goals.
1977 lost in quarters to Dinamo Kiev, Muller hasn't played, he was injured.

So, Muller played 5 CL seasons in total, yet in the last one he was injured.
Out of his 4 CLs when he was fit, he won 3 out of 4 CLs, playing 35 matches and scoring 34 goals.
1974 Bayern won, 10 matches 8 goals. CL's top scorer.

I'll quote you one more time for fun:
Van Basten played like 7-8 seasons of CL and Muller played at least 6, maybe 7. It wasn't 2-3 CL wins in 3-4 seasons.

Stop skewing numbers DELIBERATELY and we will take your points more seriously.

So, in reality, Van Basten played 5 CLs in his life, won 2 and lost 1 final.
Muller played 4 seasons when he was fit, won 3 out of 4.

I am even afraid to write a fact that CR7 played 18 CL seasons (Van Basten 2 wins out of 5, Muller 3 out of 4).
Or that Messi played 17 seasons (people will now lose their minds, lol).

But let's go back to Neymar:
8 CL seasons for now, 1 win.

So, Van Basten:
-- played 5 CL seasons, won 2
-- played only 3 NT tournaments in his life (88, 90, 92), won the only ever title for Dutch in their history in 1988 with one of the best goals of all time.
-- named player of the tournament both in 1988 and 1992
-- scored 51 out of 54 penalties in his career
-- the only no9 in a history who won 3 Ballon D'ors
-- finished career aged 28

Anyway, an interesting video about him since 90% of people don't know too much about the older footballers:

If it weren't for injuries, he could have easily been on CR7's level of titles, or probably even higher.
 

jamrock

Senior Member
Did someone say dinho was overrated?

Point me in that person's direction please, we about to have words.
 
Last edited:

BADGERBHOY

Senior Member
Van Basten:
1988: Napoli played for Italy
1989: Milan played CL
-- Milan won CL
-- Van Basten top scorer with 10 goals in 9 matches
1990: Milan played CL
-- Milan won CL
-- Van Basten scored 4 goals in 9 matches
1991: Milan played CL
-- Van Basten played the first 2 matches
-- Van Basten got injured
-- Milan got KO'd in the next round without him, by Olympique Marseille
1992: Sampdoria played for Italy, Milan didn't participate
1993: Milan played CL
-- Van Basten was fit
-- Milan reached a final and lost 0:1 to Marseille
-- Van Basten scored 8 goals in 7 matches
1994:
-- Milan won a CL, Van basten was injured and finished his career

So, basically, Van Basten played 3 CL seasons on the highest level, winning it 2 times and losing 1 final.
So, 3 seasons = 3 finals.
Playing 25 matches in those 3 seasons and scoring 22 goals.
For a comparison, Ruud Gullit in the same period played 17 matches, scored 5 CL goals during that winning era.

Outside of Milan:
1984: Ajax, KO'd in the 1st round
1985: Ajax hasn't played
1986: Ajax KO'd in the 1st round
1987: Ajax hasn't played

So, Van Basten played 3 years for Milan and 2 for Ajax.
And one more for Milan where he got injured and that was the only time in Van Basten's 4 CL years at Milan when Milan didn't reach the final.

Gerd Muller, CL participations:
1970 Bayern, Kod in the 1st round
1973 Bayern WON, 6 matches 11 goals. CL's top scorer
1975 Bayern WON, 7 matches 5 goals. CL's top scorer
1976 Bayern WON again. 6 matches 5 goals.
1977 lost in quarters to Dinamo Kiev, Muller hasn't played, he was injured.

So, Muller played 5 CL seasons in total, yet in the last one he was injured.
Out of his 4 CLs when he was fit, he won 3 out of 4 CLs, playing 35 matches and scoring 34 goals.
1974 Bayern won, 10 matches 8 goals. CL's top scorer.

I'll quote you one more time for fun:


So, in reality, Van Basten played 5 CLs in his life, won 2 and lost 1 final.
Muller played 4 seasons when he was fit, won 3 out of 4.

I am even afraid to write a fact that CR7 played 18 CL seasons (Van Basten 2 wins out of 5, Muller 3 out of 4).
Or that Messi played 17 seasons (people will now lose their minds, lol).

But let's go back to Neymar:
8 CL seasons for now, 1 win.

So, Van Basten:
-- played 5 CL seasons, won 2
-- played only 3 NT tournaments in his life (88, 90, 92), won the only ever title for Dutch in their history in 1988 with one of the best goals of all time.
-- named player of the tournament both in 1988 and 1992
-- scored 51 out of 54 penalties in his career
-- the only no9 in a history who won 3 Ballon D'ors
-- finished career aged 28

Anyway, an interesting video about him since 90% of people don't know too much about the older footballers:

If it weren't for injuries, he could have easily been on CR7's level of titles, or probably even higher.

What you dont mention is that the CL had less good teams since there was only 1 for each country.
The UEFA Cup had 2, 3 and sometimes 4 teams from each country so was arguably harder to win than the CL, plus there was an extra round to get through.
The CL now has all the best teams in it now, so obviously it is much harder to win so a comparison is pretty daft.
As for the ballon d'or, only European players were eligible for that so players like Zico, Romario and Maradona couldnt win it, so again easier to win.
Van Basten was great though, but nowhere near Messi's level.
 

BBZ8800

Senior Member
What you dont mention is that the CL had less good teams since there was only 1 for each country.
The UEFA Cup had 2, 3 and sometimes 4 teams from each country so was arguably harder to win than the CL, plus there was an extra round to get through.
The CL now has all the best teams in it now, so obviously it is much harder to win so a comparison is pretty daft.

CL had 2 teams from a winners from the previous season and a champion from other countries.
In today's world, it would be:
1. let's say Barca wins it
2. Real Madrid gets the 2nd Spanish spot
3. Man City
4. Bayern
5. Juve
6. Psg
7. Porto
8. Ajax

Whom are you losing in today's world?
1. Atletico Madrid
2. nobody from France, Italy or Germany because everyone outside of Bayern, Juve and Psg are horrible (Roma, Inter, Milan, Borussia, any French team)
3. you lose Liverpool, Chelsea, Tottenham

Also, back then there was no group stage, but KO rounds from the round of 32.
And KO rounds create more upsets than group stage since Barca/Real and big teams were KOd in the group stage for the last time somewhere in 2001'.
Also, before Bosman rule, you could had only 3 Non EU players in your team.
EU was only a Western Europe with 12-14 countries (iirc) back then.
South America, Eastern Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia, Usa were all foreigners.
Also, a lot of Eastern European countries didn't allow their players to leave their country, so champions of former Soviet Union (currently Russia, Ukraine and 10s of other countries), Romania, former Yugoslavia (currently Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Bosnia etc), former Czechoslovakia (currently Czech Republic and Slovakia), Poland, Bulgaria etc were basically NT teams.
So, we didn't have Chelsea and Liverpool, but Milan and Barca had to play with only 3 foreigners against NT teams of crazy Eastern Europeans. That's basically like playing an NT team of Croatia, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Czech today in 2 KO matches where everything is possible, without VAR and in the days when refs allowed butchering tackles on the opponents.

Think about this to see whether a CL (Champions cup was easy back then):
Real and Barca from 1966 to 1992 in 25 years won 0 CL trophies.
And played only 1 final each (and lost both: 1981 Real, 1986 Barca).
Or until 1998 when Real started to dominate the world again, Real and Barca played 15 and 6 CLs since 1966.
Real won 0 titles in 15 attempts.
Barca won 1 in 6 (1992 title).

So, to some extent, we might say that Real started to dominate after the Bosman rule and when Eastern European countries started to sell their players to Italy, Spain and England.
When rich got richer, Real and big clubs started to buy tens of South American with false passports and players like Modric, Rakitic, Kovacic, Mandzukic, Oblak and co who would have played only for domestic Eastern European teams in the past.

As for the ballon d'or, only European players were eligible for that so players like Zico, Romario and Maradona couldnt win it, so again easier to win.
Van Basten was great though, but nowhere near Messi's level.

About Ballon D Or, Van Basten won it in 1988, 1989 and 1992:
1988:
Van basten won Seria A with Milan infront of Maradona who finished 2nd.
And Netherlands won Euro 88 with him scoring in a final and being MVP of the tournament.
Romario just came to Europe, to Psv.
= so, a deserved win for Van Basten even in today's terms

1989:
Inter won Serie A infront of Napoli and Milan.
Milan won a CL with a 4:0 win over Steaua.
Brasil won Copa America with 6 goals from Bebeto and 3 from Romario.
So:
Van Basten won a CL with 10 goals in 9 matches. Plus 33 goals in 47 matches for Milan.
Maradona won nothing.
Romario won Copa America, but Bebeto was the best scorer.
= when you sum it all, CL wins again since Bebeto was Brasil's best player but he played at Vasco in Brasil, far from the eyes of journos.
= so, a win for Van Basten again in today's terms, right?

1992:
Milan won Seria A. Van Basten scored 25 goals in 31 Seria A matches, he was again an MVP on Euro 1992
Maradona was serving a 15 Month ban from football due to failing a cocaine test.
Romario was injured and scored only 9 goals for Psv.
= so, it was Van Basten vs Barca's Stoichkov that season. But since Bulgaria hasn't even qualified for Euros, you know that journos vote for players based on World cup/Euros and CL wins combined.

So, about his 3 Ballon D Ors, Romario and Maradona didn't interfer too much back then.
The problem was especially zero CL titles for Maradona and Romario in their career.
Even today, who was the last BDOr winner without CL titles previously in their careers?
Cannavaro in 2006, Ronaldinho in 2005 and Nedved in 2003.
 

Jadentheman

Active member
Ronaldinho had eto'o and messi...



Place Ronaldinho in Neymar's Brazil and he wouldn't have any world cups either. People are acting like Ronaldinho was an all-star, super playmaker responsible for their win in 2002. He had two good games in which he wasn't even their best player. Dude was a part of the greatest Brazilian NT ever right after Brazil's 1958-1970s generation.

Not surprising when the 94-2002 generation fizzled out and Ronaldinho became the main face of the team in 2006, they started to play like shit and were basically a shell of what they used to be.

Using NT trophies to judge a player's talent isn't a good metric IMO, unless he was the MAIN reason they won said games and not a part of a historical great team; ie Maradona, Beckenbaur, teenage fucking Pele scoring hattricks in 1958 etc.

Ronaldinho failed to push his team over the edge at the 2006 WC when he was the main star of that Brazil team. He also failed to push his team to a gold medal in the 2008 Olympics instead shown up by a young Messi's Argentina. In terms of club career, he failed to win a CWC and La Liga in 06/07 despite his goalscoring stats. Once he moved to Milan, he wasn't even rated by the managers that were there expect Leonardo. Despite having a campaign similar to his Barca days in 09/10, Ronaldinho FAILED to win Serie A or get past a Man United in CL. Neymar definitely has him over in terms of statistics and silverware for both Barcelona and Brazil. No contest.

But if we are referring to the overall package dribbling, passing, shot accuracy, R10 wins.
 
Last edited:

BBZ8800

Senior Member
Neymar definitely has him over in terms of statistics and silverware for both Barcelona and Brazil. No contest.

How?
Barca:
Ronaldinho 2 La ligas in 5 years with a weaker squad.
Neymar 2 La Ligas in 4 years with prime Messi, 3 years in MSN.

CL:
Ronaldinho 2006
MSN 2015

World cup:
Ronaldinho 2002

Copa America:
Ronaldinho 1999 as a sub

The only thing which Neymar has is Olympics.
But I am really not sure who rates that competition.
 

HanDW

Active member
Talking strictly about club level, the only thing Neymar has over Dinho is longevity, he hasn't touched Dinho peak so far and he is yet to win anything of importance (BdO, UCL, etc..) as a main man in his career, something Dinho and even Kaka did.
 

Jadentheman

Active member
How?
Barca:
Ronaldinho 2 La ligas in 5 years with a weaker squad.
Neymar 2 La Ligas in 4 years with prime Messi, 3 years in MSN.

CL:
Ronaldinho 2006
MSN 2015

World cup:
Ronaldinho 2002

Copa America:
Ronaldinho 1999 as a sub

The only thing which Neymar has is Olympics.
But I am really not sure who rates that competition.

Ronaldinho's Barca consisted of a supporting cast of Etoo, Deco, Larsson, Xavi, Iniesta, and Messi. In that order. Iniesta and Messi were younger and less experienced. Deco was already a CL winner by the time he came and Eto'o already played for top teams before he came to Barca. Xavi was an important player in the midfield although underrrated at that time due to stacked cast of players that stole the spotlight from him. The entire setup of Barca's possession game complimented his skills and made him look better. Same could be said for Neymar tbh.

Copa America and Brazil 2002, R10 was not a starter nor the main man. That Brazil was stacked with the best world players in their prime. I guess you could give props to R10 showing up in the England WC game but Brazil would have won anyway and that was more giving himself attention for his future career.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Home of Barca Fans

Top